But then it's also not yet superintelligent and can not yet
destroy/obsolete our species? Just like a person with down syndrome
probably can't destroy/obsolete it.
On 05/12/2014 03:54 PM, Aaron Hosford wrote:
Bugs happen. The truth is, the first few versions of this technology
are going to suck -- until we improve it. This happens with every new
technology.
It does not need the "human notion" of "right and wrong". There are
absolute/universal notions of right and wrong. Lower entropy states are
more profitable and thus "right".
Also why do you imply that something vastly more intelligent than us and
something which grew within our society would not understand our notions
of right and wrong? That makes no sense. We won't grab into the
Yudkowskian "Mindspace" and pick out some random fully fledged agent
with predefined properties. Whatever AGI system we are talking about
will need to evolved based on our knowledge pool and of course it will
be confronted with our notions of right and wrong.
On 05/12/2014 03:54 PM, Aaron Hosford wrote:
AGIs won't know, understand, or (especially) care about the human
notions of right and wrong, good and evil, unless we design it to do so.
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
