It's not really a sleight of hand...

I mean, if you can say "This sentence is false" has a truth value of 0.5,
without having to assign it a value of 0 or 1, then you have a lot more
flexibility in avoiding paradox....  What they are doing is a fancy version
of that, which works more generally...

ben


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote:

> I took a stab at the paper and it seemed like they were trying to get
> outside the system with a sleight of hand involving probabilities.  It
> seems like they are writing for a very small in-group.  Ben:  I think
> your writing is clear.  I've been working through your book.  People
> should write high-fallutin' metamath papers more like that.
>
> On 8/25/14, Ben Goertzel via AGI <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ***
> >
> > So the system in the paper by the MIRI guys seems to be based on a
> logical
> > language of analysis that would rule out certain kinds of sentences if
> they
> > tended toward not being logically evaluable.
> > ***
> >
> > No, not really; you seem to not understand their theorem  ;p
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > AGI
> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> > RSS Feed:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae
> > Modify Your Subscription:
> >
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
> >
>



-- 
Ben Goertzel, PhD
http://goertzel.org

"In an insane world, the sane man must appear to be insane". -- Capt. James
T. Kirk

"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery / None but ourselves can free our
minds" -- Robert Nesta Marley



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to