It's not really a sleight of hand... I mean, if you can say "This sentence is false" has a truth value of 0.5, without having to assign it a value of 0 or 1, then you have a lot more flexibility in avoiding paradox.... What they are doing is a fancy version of that, which works more generally...
ben On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote: > I took a stab at the paper and it seemed like they were trying to get > outside the system with a sleight of hand involving probabilities. It > seems like they are writing for a very small in-group. Ben: I think > your writing is clear. I've been working through your book. People > should write high-fallutin' metamath papers more like that. > > On 8/25/14, Ben Goertzel via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > > *** > > > > So the system in the paper by the MIRI guys seems to be based on a > logical > > language of analysis that would rule out certain kinds of sentences if > they > > tended toward not being logically evaluable. > > *** > > > > No, not really; you seem to not understand their theorem ;p > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > > AGI > > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > > RSS Feed: > https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae > > Modify Your Subscription: > > > https://www.listbox.com/member/?& > > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > > > -- Ben Goertzel, PhD http://goertzel.org "In an insane world, the sane man must appear to be insane". -- Capt. James T. Kirk "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery / None but ourselves can free our minds" -- Robert Nesta Marley ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
