My apologies for that poor attempt at humor. I'm not sure it's possible or necessary to account for every possible variable that could change if a butterfly flaps its wings in Madagascar. Maybe in a certain context only a few variables matter. Then you would have to write an extremely complicated program to account for the variables that do matter depending on whether some other variables are present and what degree they are present.
Basically, I'm arguing the case that AI/AGI should be focusing on building neural networks that can function similar to human brain, and leave it to humans or the neural network itself to determine what variables are important. On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:35 PM, Kyle Kidd <[email protected]> wrote: > P = they will come > X = you build it > Q = a bird flies by > ~P = they will not come > > [Test] > Execute X > > [Results] > A > B > C > . > . > . > Z53002011232038402 > > Conclusion: Sometimes variables are useless > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Piaget Modeler via AGI <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> How have knowledge representations dealt with the absence of a >> proposition? >> >> Suppose there is a knowledge base KB containing a proposition >> >> P >> >> We can represent P being false as >> >> (not P) >> >> But how do you represesent the fact that neither P nor (not P) are in >> the KB? >> >> Kindly advise. >> >> ~PM >> *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/12578217-f409cecc> | >> Modify >> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> >> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> >> > > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
