I've generally found three types of respondents: (1) Those who think they understand your question but don't. (2) Those that understand your question.(3) Those that just want to be facetious and appear clever. It doesn't matter what I think, your intention categorizes you. Cheers, ~PM Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:54:32 -0500 Subject: Re: [agi] P, Not P, and the absence of P. From: [email protected] To: [email protected]
Correction somehow the link got mixed up: Knowing and Not Knowing link is http://www.doceo.co.uk/tools/knowing.htm On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Russ Hurlbut <[email protected]> wrote: There are generally type types of respondents to a question like the one you have posed: (i) those that don't know that they don't know what you don't know; and (ii) those that know that they know what you don't know. This is because: (iii) those that don't know that they know what you don't know generally will not respond; and (iv) those that know that they don't know what you don't know will (again) generally not respond. Now, if you took the time to wrap your head around that, you may find Knowing and Not Knowing of some use in answering the question: "How have knowledge representations dealt with the absence of a proposition?" So into which group does this response belong? On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Piaget Modeler via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: How have knowledge representations dealt with the absence of a proposition? AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
