On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Jim Bromer via AGI <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Does a polynomial time solution to 3-SAT mean that all Internet Encryption 
> would be easily broken?
>
> (1.) Could a One-Time Pad code be broken by 3-SAT P=NP.

No. Only encryption methods where the key is shorter than the message
would be broken. That is everything except one time pad.

> (2.) An Boolean algorithm does not necessarily flatten to a formal (or 
> equivalent) Boolean 3-SAT problem in polynomial time. Can an algorithm be 
> used to encode problems at a more complex level that might be solved in 
> polynomial time with the right combination of values?

Yes it does. 
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~duclos/teaching/inf242/SAT-3SAT-and-other-red.pdf

> (3.) Can a 4-SAT problem be reduced to 3-SAT in polynomial time? Even if 
> there is a polynomial time solution to 3-SAT does that mean that higher order 
> SAT problems can be reduced to 3-SAT in polynomial time?

Yes. 4-SAT to 3-SAT is just a special case of SAT to 3-SAT.

> Can a SAT problem be encoded into a dynamic algorithm? Can a SAT problem be 
> encoded into a 4-SAT or higher problem in a way to make it extremely 
> difficult for a 3-SAT P=NP?

All known SAT solvers have worst case exponential time complexity,
just like all other NP-complete problems.

> Is it possible that polynomial time solution to 3-SAT might not be obviously 
> feasible for 4-SAT.  (This is not a case of proving that 4-SAT is np hard or 
> np complete.)
>
> I don't have the time or the ability to figure this out on my own. I am still 
> struggling with p=np?

Maybe you could solve one of the hundreds of other NP-complete
problems and then reduce SAT to it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NP-complete_problems


-- 
-- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to