On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:54 PM, John Rose via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > There would also need to be a protocol to establish trust based on knowledge > right? If I'm a an expert for example in some species of ant (say Cephalotes > specularis) there would need to be informational transactions to query and > establish knowledge trust to a peer.
I would have to be able to detect that you're not sending me spam. That requires some AI. I would gather responses from several sites and give greater weight to those with high reputations like Wikipedia and university websites. Then I would compare the responses and adjust their rankings. >> I am sure that if you tried to copy Google's index with millions of queries, >> they >> would put a quick stop to that. >> > > It might be difficult for them to detect. A network of geographically > dispersed machines intermittently performing queries across vast spans of > domain knowledge. Unless there is a pattern or signifier within the query > data how would they know? Unless they begin to force login at some point... > Look at in the reverse direction, we, the human system (from Google's > perspective) and external machines (Google) are performing intermittent > queries on us and taking a snapshot of the human index. I suppose you could do it if you controlled a botnet. But even then you might arouse suspicions and they start sending you CAPTCHAs to solve. But that's another AI problem, right? -- -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
