> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Richfield [mailto:[email protected]] > Anyway, the questionable assumptions I see are: > 1. That ANYONE can be "trusted" (EVERYONE is laboring under > misconceptions).
Yes, or I would say that information needs some sort of trust attribute if there were a protocol. The problem is carrying that information integrity across replications with trust. A typical reaction to this issue is to improve methods of verifying the information source "person" but the source is often lost when the integrity or structure of the information changes so there is an element of intuition that has to be built, kind of like what the human mind does. John ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
