Mike Archbold said: Jim, I think about the issue you emphasize of no 'independent concepts' frequently. It plays a role in my latest approximate design. Mike A
The idea of using systems of interdependent concepts is something that can be simulated easily since the interdependence is something that can be abstracted in computational terms. So, if someone wanted just to try it with meaningless abstract tokens or objects he could do that. He could use values or discreet interrelations. New relations could be introduced and studied. The concepts could be used with different syntactic structures (or different functional relations based on different characteristics) and so on. The same kind of thing can be used with concepts that have very simplistic meanings. Because this idea that you described as "no independent concepts" is (itself) computationally feasible that can lead to all sorts of simple programmable possibilities. I am definitely going to try this So a simulation of highly interdependent concepts and interdependent conceptual 'roles' is something that can be very simple. Even though conceptual relativism is something that goes beyond the interdependence of the concepts, your abstraction of this essential feature of the concept may be a help to my finding a good starting point for my next attempt to write a simple AGI program Jim Bromer ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
