On 10/9/14, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote:
>  Mike Archbold said:
> Jim, I think about the issue you emphasize of no 'independent
> concepts' frequently.  It plays a role in my latest approximate
> design.  Mike A
>
>
>
> The idea of using systems of interdependent concepts is something that
> can be simulated easily since the interdependence is something that
> can be abstracted in computational terms. So, if someone wanted just
> to try it with meaningless abstract tokens or objects he could do
> that. He could use values or discreet interrelations. New relations
> could be introduced and studied. The concepts could be used with
> different syntactic structures (or different functional relations
> based on different characteristics) and so on. The same kind of thing
> can be used with concepts that have very simplistic meanings.
>
> Because this idea that you described as "no independent concepts" is
> (itself) computationally feasible that can lead to all sorts of simple
> programmable possibilities. I am definitely going to try this
>
> So a simulation of highly interdependent concepts and interdependent
> conceptual 'roles' is something that can be very simple. Even though
> conceptual relativism is something that goes beyond the
> interdependence of the concepts, your abstraction of this essential
> feature of the concept may be a help to my finding a good starting
> point for my next attempt to write a simple AGI program
> Jim Bromer
>

There has been some talk here lately of Tononi's integrated
information theory.  I only know the summary generalities, but it is a
(I think) holistic approach with mathematics holding it up.  In the
wiki, at least, they are not talking about having a bunch of stand
alone "independent concepts."


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to