>
> When teaching an AGI, will the world we explain to the AGI be full of
> unknowns or knowns?


The world we live in is, and always will be, full of unknowns. If we want
an AI that is capable of being more than a trumped-up theorem prover that
depends on us to feed it good assumptions, it is going to have to be
capable of dealing with these unknowns on a permanent basis. It is going to
have to choose its own assumptions based on what helps it make sense of the
world, rather than having them spoon fed to it. If we tell it there is (or
is not) a god, it should question that statement just like a human being
does, and come to its own conclusions based on what fits most comfortably
with the rest of its model of reality.

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Piaget Modeler via AGI <[email protected]>
wrote:

> For an AGI system, would "God" be an efficient placeholder for the
> "unknown cause" of an event or situation?
> It seems that this is what some people do when faced with inexplicable
> situations that their mental model is
> not sufficient to generate an otherwise plausible hypothesis?  And would
> this be a slippery slope?
>
> On the other hand, police detectives, when investigating a murder seem to
> have some model of human action
>  and causes of death.  I don't think they put "God" as a placeholder for
> the cause of a death in a particular case.
>
> When teaching an AGI, will the world we explain to the AGI be full of
> unknowns or knowns?
>
> Thoughts?
>
> ~PM
>
>
>
>
>    *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/23050605-2da819ff> |
> Modify
> <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
> Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com>
>



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to