To muddy the waters even more, our legal system allows "Acts of God" as reasons
/ causes for events.
~PM
On 1/22/15 9:04 PM, Alex Fok via AGI
wrote:
In my opinion, "God" and "I
don't know" is basically the same thing with
different wording. It just the name for the collection of
knowledge that are not being understand yet.
Putting "God" as a placeholder is fine. After all, that
what humanity did in the past.
Say what? That humanity did X in the past in no way says doing X
was or is reasonable. People thought there where weather spirits
too. Does that mean it is ok to do so now?
"I don't know" is a statement of epistemological uncertainty about
something in particular. "God" is a statement of certainty about a
purported particular quite peculiarly defined existent. It is not
at all a fit for label for what we don't have reasonable
epistemological certainty about in general.
This is sheer nonsense.
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
