Do you mean like "Neural Propositions: Structures for Cognitive Systems" ? ~PM > Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:04:02 -0500 > Subject: [agi] Multiple Conceptual Level Networks > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > > I came up with a great concept-theory using cross generalizations on > logic so I decided to write about it. As I thought about it I > remembered seeing some introductory text about network theory > somewhere and the first examples that they mentioned used binary > nodes. Some of the examples were effectively about kinds of logical > cross-generalizations. So what happened to my great new theory? > Somehow it fizzled into something that was from some introductory > text about networks. The thing is, I don't think current network > theory is very interesting. > > In order to create more interesting networks you have to have multiple > layers. Not just multiple processing layers but multiple conceptual > layers. But these concept layers should not be associated only by a > simplistic associations (on concept nodes for instance) but by the > potential for nodes on one layer to interact dramatically with other > layers. Of course this can be implemented using contemporary > conventions about nodal networks. So why is the idea of multiple > concept layers important? Because of the potential of the layered > networks to represent cross-categorical relations which might be > needed to solve difficult problems and which might be more susceptible > to effective methods of analysis. > > When Internet traffic is being analyzed, for example, the analysis > occurs on a different conceptual level than the traffic itself. In > this case, there is very limited interaction with the traffic and the > analysis. If the analysis is sent to a web manager then the analytical > function is itself producing some traffic on the same system. The > number of conceptual levels in this example is extremely constricted > (there are 2 levels) and the interaction between the levels is tightly > constrained as well. > > But it is easy to imagine systems where there are many different kinds > of conceptual levels and a lot of different ways interaction can > occur. Can you do this with conventional notions about sub-networks? > Ok, but there are times when you need to free your mind from > conventional thinking. > Jim Bromer > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/19999924-4a978ccc > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
