Could you explain the rules?
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Steve Richfield via AGI <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems obvious (to) me that any envisioned super duper AGI of the future > would be easily able to win a reverse Turing competition - demonstrating > with advanced logical solutions to difficult problems that it is a machine > and NOT merely human. > > To see how such an AGI might function, and how its responses might be > perceived by mere humans, it seems (to me) VERY interesting to see what > might come from such a competition, even though (for now) it only includes > teams of mere humans. > > I suspect that heidenbugs (correct functionality that is seen to be > erroneous) and incorrectly perceived sinister intent would make it nearly > impossible for mere humans to accurately judge such a competition. If so, > this would seem to doom the future utility of AGIs. > > As with Winograd schemas, the test is in the doing. Every your or so I > post looking for others interesting in operating and/or participating in a > reverse Turing competition. > > Any interest? > > Steve > > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/3701026-786a0853> | Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > -- -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected] ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
