The hype and the implied conquest of AI that winning at chess, recognizing objects in pictures and winning at jeopardy seems to imply just does not jive with the fact that search engine technology lacks any noticeable intellect even though the computing power that Google, Bing or IBM and thousands of other corporations possess is extremely impressive. Jim Bromer
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:29 PM, Jim Bromer <[email protected]> wrote: > If industry has AI pretty well figured out then why are search engines > so incapable of thinking outside the box? The conclusion looks > inescapable to me. Yes there will be a day when someone makes a > significant achievement while the rest of us might miss it completely > but the idea that contemporary deep search (or some other AI method) > has achieved the hype or the implied conquest that winning at chess > and jeopardy seems to imply just does not jive with the computing > power Google, Bing or IBM have. There is a substantial disconnect > between low level -almost- human reasoning and deep learning. > Jim Bromer ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
