What I am calling 'conceptual integration' is something that has (presumably) been the implicit goal of many AI researchers for years. So even though some of these guys understand what I am talking about they are still dismissive of the idea because it is not something that is completely new to them or wows the guys that wow them. But then maybe the problem is that it is not sufficiently explicit for them. In order to make progress on the problem we have to be able to analyze it as an abstraction (or more astutely as a number of abstractions.)
It should be obvious that I talking about more than Berkeley (CA) Conceptual Blending. (In fact, the insistence Conceptual Integration only refers to Conceptual Blending is a repressive reactionary response to the significance of this topic.) ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
