Just to clarify:

Ben said:

"However, I'll say now that neurons are basically nodes and synapses are
basically links, so it's clear that a node-link data structure in itself
isn't way off..."

The point that Pribram and other similar minded cognitive neuroscientists
make is that the neuron is NOT the processing unit.  It is the receptive
fields that form a sensor array and then it is neuronal assembles and
regional functional units (such as frontal lobes).  They all work together.
The Gabor (Fourier) transforms an energy spectrum that covers all of the
physical reality involved in being situated in time and space. This is
complex, not simple phenomenon and would, by definition, provide a halting
condition to any serial computing device.  Why?  Because "a = a" would
become an indeterminate relationship at least once.

Rough sets and fuzzy logic go after this indeterminate relationship
directly, but rough sets assume stratification and fuzzification does not.
(I think that Zadeh agrees with me on this.)

The neurons are a type of transportation system the feeds the metabolic
processes.

To not see this is to avoid stratification and physics.

The correspondence comes from the stratified process establishing an open
loop process that involves all levels of physical reality.

Walter Freeman has the best work on this....  I have lost his e-mail
address.  (please forward?)


-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/

Reply via email to