agi  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Pei Wang
  • RE: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Ed Porter
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" [Was: Occam's Razor and its abuse] Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] "the universe is computable" ..PS Ben Goertzel
• [agi] Machine Consciousness Workshop, Hong Kong, June 2009 Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Machine Consciousness Workshop, Hong Kong, June 2009 Colin Hales
  • Re: [agi] Machine Consciousness Workshop, Hong Kong, June 2009 Ben Goertzel
• [agi] Two Remarkable Computational Competencies of the SGA Lukasz Stafiniak
  • [agi] Re: Two Remarkable Computational Competencies of the SGA Lukasz Stafiniak
• META: ad hominem attacks WAS Re: [agi] virtual credits again Ben Goertzel
  • Re: META: ad hominem attacks WAS Re: [agi] virtual credits again Trent Waddington
  • Re: META: ad hominem attacks WAS Re: [agi] virtual credits again Ben Goertzel
• Re: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Samantha Atkins
  • Re: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Bob Mottram
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Mike Archbold
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence wannabe
  • Re: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Russell Wallace
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Russell Wallace
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Russell Wallace
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Cloud Intelligence Matt Mahoney
• [agi] virtual credits again YKY (Yan King Yin)
  • Re: [agi] virtual credits again Samantha Atkins
  • Re: [agi] virtual credits again Trent Waddington
  • Re: [agi] virtual credits again YKY (Yan King Yin)
  • Re: [agi] virtual credits again Trent Waddington
  • RE: [agi] virtual credits again Benjamin Johnston
  • Re: [agi] virtual credits again Trent Waddington
  • Re: [agi] virtual credits again Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] virtual credits again Ben Goertzel
• [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • RE: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ed Porter
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ed Porter
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • RE: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ed Porter
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Charles Hixson
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse William Pearson
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Matt Mahoney
  • [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Eric Baum
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Occam's Razor and its abuse Mark Waser
• [agi] Re: Causality and science Vladimir Nesov
• [agi] OpenCog hands-on workshop Sunday Ben Goertzel
• On architecture was Re: [agi] On programming languages William Pearson
  • Re: On architecture was Re: [agi] On programming languages Steve Richfield
• [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages J Marlow
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Stephen Reed
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Stephen Reed
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Stephen Reed
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Stephen Reed
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Mark Waser
  • RE: [agi] On programming languages John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Stephen Reed
  • Re: [agi] On programming languages Russell Wallace
• [agi] Fun with first-order inference in OpenCog ... Ben Goertzel
• [agi] A huge amount of math now in standard first-order predicate logic format! Ben Goertzel
  • AW: [agi] A huge amount of math now in standard first-order predicate logic format! Dr. Matthias Heger
• [agi] Re: Value of philosophy Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] Re: Value of philosophy Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Re: Value of philosophy William Pearson
  • Re: [agi] Re: Value of philosophy Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Re: Value of philosophy Ben Goertzel

• Earlier messages
• Later messages