For those of us who are following the KNOW
thread, could somebody comment on the capabilities of KNOW beyond existing
knowledge representation language such as the ARFF format for the popular WEKA
system.
I've input data into such a system before and
while existing systems have extensive grammar for representing logical relations
they have very limited capabilities for more ambiguous
knowledge.
The KNOW document Ben posted a link too
says:
"Syntax to semantics mapping in the natural
language module, in which the final result should be represented in this
language;"
This kind of capabilities would certainly be a
huge advance over something like ARFF. If anyone works with ARFF, could he
or she comment on the possibilities of such translation with the ARFF
grammar? Does anyone who's familiar with the technical workings of
knowledge representation language have any idea on how this kind of mapping
could be accomplished?
-Daniel
*************************************
Daniel
Colonnese
Computer Science Dept. NCSU
2718 Clark
Street
Raleigh NC 27670
Voice: (919) 451-3141
Fax:
(775) 361-4495
http://www4.ncsu.edu:8030/~dcolonn/
*************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gus Constan
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 8:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [agi] An Artificial General Intelligence in the MakingHi Ben;Would you kindly provide a valid url for Knowledge Representation for Inferencein your reference document www.goertzel.org/papers/KNOWSpecification.htmthanksGus