> 3) > Any successful AGI system is also going to have components in two other > categories: > > a) specialized-intelligence components that solve particular problems in > ways having little or nothing to do with truly general intelligence > capability > > b) specialized-intelligence components that are explicitly built on top of > components having truly general intelligence capability >
Are you willing to explain why you put them in this order, or has this available elsewhere, perhaps on agiri.org? I ask because it's my perspective that the brain is built the other way around, with specialized intelligence modules on the bottom and AGI built on top of them. I know you're not trying to build a brain per se, but I'm curious why you choose this manner to stack ASI and AGI. It's my belief that in the case of our brains, what we call AGI is the seamless combination of many ASI's. Our problem solving looks general, but it really isn't. There's AGI wiring on top to glue it all together, but most of the work is being done subconsciously in specialized regions. -Brad ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
