|
Yes, we have instincts, drives built into our
systems at a hardware level, beyond the ability to reprogram through merely a
software upgrade. These drives, sex, pain/pleasure, food, air, security,
social status, self-actualization, are not supergoals, they are
reinforcers.
Reinforcers give you positive or negative feelings
when they are encountered.
Supergoals are the top level of rules you use to
determine a choice of behavior.
You can make reinforcers your supergoals, which is
what animals do because their contextual understanding, and reasoning
ability is so limited. People have a choice. You don't have to
be a slave to the biologically programmed drives you were born with. You
can perceive a broader context where you are not the center of the
universe. You can even imagine redesigning your hardware and software to
become something completely different with no vestige of your human
reinforcers.
Can a system choose to change its supergoal, or
supergoals? Obviously not, unless some method of supergoal change is
specifically written into the supergoals. People's supergoals change as
they mature but this is not a voluntary process. Systems can be designed
to have some sensitivity to the external environment for supergoal
modification. Certainly systems with immutable supergoals are more stable,
but stability isn't always desirable or even safe.
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- Re: [agi] Unlimited intelligence. --- Super Goals deering
- Re[2]: [agi] Unlimited intelligence. --- Super Goals Dennis Gorelik
