On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:57:44AM -0500, Ben Goertzel wrote: > > > IMO your third option is the closest to being correct.. > > "Qualia" and "information processing" are different perspectives on the same > underlying reality.
How do I measure qualia? As opposed to detecting homologies/patterns in operation fingerprints in information processing in physical systems? And how is qualia a constructive scientific theory? Qualia are phlogiston. Or vis vitalis, pick your choice. Worse than worthless: actively misleading. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp7REwIMA8ez.pgp
Description: PGP signature
