> > The arguments are very simple: 25 GBytes/s memory bandwidth, and 10^10
> > nodes with some 10^6 computational elements each, with a ~ms resolution
> > range result in requirements not compatible with what we know of
> > physics of computation. So you have to formulate your problem in
> > terms of 10^6...10^10 asynchronous, locally-tight globally-loose coupled
> > threads, which will require fine-grain parallelism. No current systems
> > (especially, affordable ones) do fit the bill.
>
> I'm afraid the issue is not as simple as you belief.

Yes: IMO, this argument is very simple, but wrong.

By this same argument, we need this kind of computational power to
create a pocket calculator.  Because, before pocket calculators were
built, the human brain was the only known system able to carry out
complex arithmetic calculations...

AGI systems, via having radically different architectures from the
human brain, may potentially make far more effective use of
computational resources.

No, I don't expect skeptics to believe this --- but I don't see why
the opposite argument (that human brain level compute power is needed
for AGI) is any more convincing, based on the existing evidence...

-- Ben G

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to