What is the CPU processing needed for AGI?
 
Dan Goe
----------------------------------------------------
>From : Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To : [email protected]
Subject : Re: [agi] Processing speed for core intelligence in human 
brain 
Date : Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:14:57 -0400
> Hi,
> 
> > On a related subject, I argued in What is Thought? that the hard
> > problem was not processor speed for running the AI, but coding the
> > software,
> 
> This is definitely true.
> 
> However, processor speed for research is often a significant issue.
> With faster processors, it would be quicker to run tests verifying or
> refuting various hypotheses about various AI algorithms.  Lacking a
> rigorous science of AI algorithms and structures, the computational
> resources needed to create an AGI may exceed significantly those
> required to run an AGI.
> 
> For instance, your Hayek algorithms runs rather slowly, and
> experimentation with variations on Hayek would certainly be more fun
> if processors were a few orders of magnitude faster ;-)
> 
> > and estimated that evolution had gone through very roughly
> > 10^35 viruses since the dawn of time, as very rough estimate of raw 
power 
> > available to it for software discovery.
> > Dan Fischer did a similar physicist's estimate, coming up with 10^35 
bacteria. 
> > However, Warren has recently done some digging
> > on the subject, and come up with what seems to be a better estimate
> > that 10^44 bacteria have lived on Earth.
> 
> However, evolution is not doing software design using anywhere near
> the same process that we human scientists are.  So I don't think these
> sorts of calculations are very directly relevant...
> 
> -- Ben
> 
> -------
> To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
> please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to