Here are some of my attempts at explaining RSI... (1) As a given instance of intelligence, as defined as an algorithm of an agent capable of achieving complex goals in complex environments, approaches the theoretical limits of efficiency for this class of algorithms, intelligence approaches infinity. Since increasing computational resources available for an algorithm is a complex goal in a complex environment, the more intelligent an instance of intelligence becomes, the more capable it is in increasing the computational resources for the algorithm, as well as more capable in optimizing the algorithm for maximum efficiency, thus increasing its intelligence in a positive feedback loop.
(2) Suppose an instance of a mind has direct access to some means of both improving and expanding both the hardware and software capability of its particular implementation. Suppose also that the goal system of this mind elicits a strong goal that directs its behavior to aggressively take advantage of these means. Given each increase in capability of the mind's implementation, it could (1) increase the speed at which its hardware is upgraded and expanded, (2) More quickly, cleverly, and elegantly optimize its existing software base to maximize capability, (3) Develop better cognitive tools and functions more quickly and in more quantity, and (4) Optimize its implementation on successively lower levels by researching and developing better, smaller, more advanced hardware. This would create a positive feedback loop- the more capable its implementation, the more capable it is in improving its implementation. How fast could RSI plausibly happen? Is RSI inevitable / how soon will it be? How do we truly maximize the benefit to humanity? It is my opinion that this could happen extremely quickly once a completely functional AGI is achieved. I think its plausible it could happen against the will of the designers (and go on to pose an existential risk), and quite likely that it would move along quite well with the designers intention, however, this opens up the door to existential disasters in the form of so-called Failures of Friendliness. I think its fairly implausible the designers would suppress this process, except those that are concerned about completely working out issues of Friendliness in the AGI design. ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
