On 1/25/07, Bob Mottram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The trouble is that you can only really decide whether a statement is
"non-probabilistic" if enough people have voted unanimously yes or no. Even then you can't be sure that the next person to vote won't go the opposite way. At the initial stage we may rely on the "wisdom of crowds" (wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wisdom_of_Crowds), using voting on one set of common knowledge. Although in later stages I think separate sub-communities might be desirable. This is not a worrying issue IMO. YKY ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
