Pei Wang's uncertain logic is **not** probabilistic, though it uses
frequency calculations
We have our own probabilistic logic theory called Probabilistic Logic
Networks (PLN), which will be described in a book to be released
toward the end of this year or the start of 2008.
The differences btween NARS and PLN are too numerous for an email,
but among them are
-- PLN is based on a probabilistic semantics whereas NARS uses a
different semantics
-- PLN uses a combination of term logic and predicate logic whereas
NARS is more strictly a term logic approach
These foundational differences lead to a large number of more
specific technical differences, not surprisingly.
For instance, the NARS inference formulas only involve the uncertain
truth values of relationships, whereas PLN's involve the uncertain
truth values of both relationships and terms. Relatedly, the PLN
induction and abduction formulas utilize Bayes rule whereas the NARS
induction and abduction formulas do not...
-- Ben
On Jan 28, 2007, at 5:34 PM, YKY (Yan King Yin) wrote:
Ben,
Is the probabilistic logic you use in Novamente the same as Pei
Wang's version? If not, why do you use your version?
YKY
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
