Well, in fact, Novamente is **not** constrained from having Dutch
books made against it, because it is not a perfectly consistent
probabilistic reasoner.
It seeks to maintain probabilistic consistency, but balances this
with other virtues...
This is really a necessary consequuence of trying to deal with
complex situations using relatively limited computational resources,
as Pei has repeatedly pointed out
ben
On Feb 6, 2007, at 3:18 PM, gts wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:18:09 -0500, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
The scenario I described was in fact a dutch book scenario...
The next step might then be to show how Novamente is constrained
from allowing dutch books to be made against it. This would prove
Novamente's probabilistic reasoning to be coherent in the sense
meant by De Finetti.
-gts
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
