gts wrote:
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 10:57:04 -0500, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

The dramatic probabilistic incoherency of humans is demonstrated by human behavior in casinos.

You mean something more stringent than me by the word incoherency, then. Human betting behavior in casinos is stupid but it is not incoherent in the De Finetti sense as I understand it.

It's easy to prove incoherence: one need only show how a dutch book can be made against the allegedly incoherent person. Vulnerability to dutch books is how incoherence is defined under the theory.

Casino gamblers are stupid in so much as they place bets with unfavorable odds, but they do not by virtue of those stupid bets make themselves vulnerable to dutch books. One sometimes wins against unfavorable odds but it is never possible to beat a dutch book. In fact casinos do not even offer such betting situations.

-gts

I suspect you of mis-analyzing the goals and rewards of casino gamblers. I don't personally know any of those addicted to gambling, but I know people who buy lottery tickets every week. They derive pleasure not only from winning, but also from dreaming about winning. Then there's the matter of "expected marginal value". I may suspect that winning would have much less of a positive result than they expect, but this hardly matters as almost nobody will actually win. Therefore most of the benefit must be derivable without winning.

Perhaps most gambling is not a zero-sum game. (Actually, I suspect that winning the lottery may well be a negative result. I'm not certain, but many reports indicate that such a person is more likely to be bankrupt 5 years later than a person who did not win. [Reliability of such reports? Unverified.])

I'm not sure whether or not this speaks to the points that you are attempting to raise, but it certainly calls into question comments about "stupid bets". Well, the lottery isn't a casino, so perhaps you are correct, but I would be suspicious about calculating values based solely on the money.

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303

Reply via email to