Richard Loosemore writes:
The best we can do is to use the human design as a close inspiration -- we do not have to make an exact copy, we just need to get close enough to build something in the same family of systems, that's all -- and set up progress criteria based on how well we explain and understand that design.
Sounds like a good approach, if we have much of a solid understanding of human intelligence. How do we define "close enough" and which of the many half-baked theories defining the "family of systems" should we use, and why? Should we start with Dennett or Fodor or Kant or what? ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
