But are you saying that something in your proprietary ideas gives you a concrete reason that could demonstrate why the argument I presented contains a flaw? You have a knock-down proof that the argument is wrong, that you cannot divulge?
"Knock down proof" is too strong. I have a set of plausible-looking conjectures -- some purely mathematical -- some about the statistics of the everyday physical world which, if true, imply that an AGI design like Novamente can work in terms of solving a variety of complex problems in the everyday physical world... I have chosen not to work on proving these conjectures true, but merely to state them formally and then work on building the NM system instead... ben ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
