You are right that NLP implies the processing of world-view, I just
remind that general world-view management should be outsourced to the
AGI core.
I agree. My mental separation is that the NLP "module" simply consists of
the parser and the generator but that they absolutely require the contents
of (i.e. some form of access or calls to) the knowledge base/world model.
HOWEVER, in order to make NLP easier, I am making some very important
assumptions about the view of the knowledge base/world model that the NLP
module is using -- which then leads to a number of seriously simplifying
assumptions.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lukasz Stafiniak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] rule-based NL system
On 4/28/07, Lukasz Stafiniak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
So you mean, that NLP can/must understand the Whorfian, Barthesian,
philosophical "broad language" using the tools of computational
linguistics' "narrow language"?
Then NLP=AGI (holistic, non-modular view)
Not that structuralists, tracing back to Leibniz, wouldn't like to achieve
that.
I think we actually agree, so I would like to "cut the dispute" :-)
You are right that NLP implies the processing of world-view, I just
remind that general world-view management should be outsourced to the
AGI core.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
