Richard, It seems that the major difference between you and me is not on the definition of "intelligence", but on the definition of "definition". :)
Pei On 5/21/07, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pei Wang wrote: > Richard, > > I agree with you that "intelligence" currently has no > classical/objective/true/formal definition. > > However, I hope your opinion (given the title of the post) won't be > understood as "you can take intelligence to mean whatever you want, > and since the term has no definition, all attempts toward AI/AGI are > equally possible" --- this is what many people believe, which I > consider as equally bad as the belief you criticized. > > Pei Pei, Oh certainly, I am in complete agreement with you on that. My mistake for the ambiguity of the title of the post: that title should not be interpreted by anyone to mean that anything whatsoever could be an intelligence. Far from it. Richard Loosemore. ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936
