--- Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 05:57:49PM -0700, Matt Mahoney wrote: > > > > Only as an upper bound. > > Lower bound. The earliest AGI implementations are likely to be highly > inefficient. Faster algo's will be found only later, over time, as the > actual problem is understood better.
No, I mean that the most computationally efficient form of AGI could not require more computation than the brain. Early versions might, yes. -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=47987500-833c0e
