On 10/2/07, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Effective deciding of these "should" questions has two major elements: > > (1) understanding of the "evaluation-function" of the assessors with > > respect to these specified "ends", and (2) understanding of principles > > (of nature) supporting increasingly coherent expression of that > > evolving "evaluation function". > > So how do I get to be an assessor and decide?
You already are and do, to the extent that you are and do. Is my writing really that obscure? The pragmatic point is that there are no absolute answers, but you absolutely can improve the process (from any particular subjective point of view.) - Jef ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=48959633-3f7f85
