Vladimir Nesov wrote:
On 10/5/07, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vladimir Nesov wrote:
Richard,
It's a question of notation. Yes, you can sometimes formulate
difficult problems succinctly. GoL is just another formalism in which
it's possible. What does it have to do with anything?
It has to do with the argument in my paper.
Strictly speaking, it doesn't answer that question.
Can there ever be a scientific theory that
predicts all the "interesting creatures" given only the rules?
Which is equivalent to asking "can there be a feasible solution to
that immensely difficult, but succinctly formulated problem?" In
general, no. But you can solve it on 'good enough' level by
experimenting with simulation. Reasonable. Yet it's strange to frame
it as something that is usually never done.
Again, I have to say that this thread is about the specific use that I
make, in my paper, of the Game of Life cellular automaton.
So, if you take a look at that question of mine that you quote above
"Can there ever be a scientific theory that predicts all the
"interesting creatures" given only the rules?" .... when you respond
with the words "... no, but ..." everything that comes after the word
"no" has no relevance in the context of my paper.
Richard Loosemore
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=50332070-1dfd6b
