These 'recastings' of problems are essentially inference steps, where each step is evident and is performed by trained expert's intuition. Sequence of such simple steps can constitute complex inference which leads to solution of complex problem. This recasting isn't necessarily related to physical common sense, even though each intermediate representation can be represented as spatially-temporal construction by virtue of being representable by frame graphs evolving over time, which does not reflect the rules of this evolution (which are the essence of inference which is being performed).
On 10/11/07, Mike Tintner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just to underline my point about the common sense foundations of logic and > general intelligence - I came across this from : Education & Learning to > Think by Lauren B Resnick - (and a section entitled "General Reasoning - > Improving Intelligence). > > "Recent research in science problem solving shows that experts do not > respond to problems as they are presented - writing equations for every > relationship described and then using routine procedures for manipulating > equations.Instead they reinterpret the problems, recasting them in terms of > general scientific principles until the solutions become almost > self-evident." > > He points out that the same principles apply to virtually all subjects in > the curriculum. I would suggest that those experts are recasting problems > principally in terms of physical common sense models. NARS, it seems to me, > "responds to problems as they are presented." > > > ----- > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&; > -- Vladimir Nesov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=52152341-3f47a2
