I'll buy internal spatio-perception (i.e. a three-d world model) but not the
visual/vision part (which I believe is totally unnecessary).
Why is *vision* necessary for grounding or to completely "understand"
natural language?
----- Original Message -----
From: "a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: [agi] Do the inference rules.. P.S.
Mark Waser wrote:
Concepts cannot be grounded without vision.
So . . . . explain how people who are blind from birth are functionally
intelligent.
It is impossible to completely "understand" natural language without
vision.
So . . . . you believe that blind-from-birth people don't completely
understand English?
All blind people still have internal visualspatio perception.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=52491934-8d1f16
