No you are not mundane. All these things on the list (or most) are very well to be expected from a generally intelligent system or its derivatives. But I have this urge, being a software developer, to smash all these things up into their constituent components, partition commonalties, eliminate dupes, and perhaps further smash up into an atomic representation of intelligence as little intelligent engines that can be combined in various ways to build higher level functions. Kind of like a cellular automata approach and perhaps CA structures can be used. I really don't want to waste 10 years developing a giant piece of bloatage code that never fully works. Better to exhaust all possibilities in the mind and on paper as much as possible as software dev can be a giant PIA mess if not thought out beforehand as much as possible. Yes you can go so far before doing prototyping and testing but certain prototypes can take many months to build.
Several on this email list have already gotten to this point and it may be more productive digesting their systems instead of reinventing. Even so that leaves many questions open about testing. Someone can claim they have AGI but how do you really know, could be just a highly sophisticated chatterbot. John From: Edward W. Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I guess I am mundane. I don't spend a lot of time thinking about a "definition of intelligence." Goertzel's is good enough for me. Instead I think in terms of what I want these machines to do -- which includes human-level: -NL understanding and generation (including discourse level) -Speech recognition and generation (including appropriate pitch and volume modulation) -Non-speech auditory recognition and generation -Visual recognition and real time video generation -World-knowledge representation, understanding and reasoning -Computer program understanding and generation -Common sense reasoning -Cognition -Context sensitivity -Automatic learning -Intuition -Creativity -Inventiveness -Understanding human nature and human desires and goals(not expecting full human-level here) -Ability to scan and store and, over time, convert and incorporate into learned deep structure vast amounts of knowledge including ultimately all available recorded knowledge . To do such thinking I have come up with a fairly uniform approach to all these tasks, so I guess you could call that approach something approaching "a theory of intelligence". But I mainly think of it as a theory of how to get certain really cool things done. I don't expect to get what is listed all at once, but, barring some major set back, this will probably all happen (with perhaps partial exception on the last item) within twenty years, and with the right people getting big money most of it could substantially all happen in ten. In addition, as we get closer to the threshold I think "intelligence" (at least from our perspective) should include: -helping make individual people, human organizations, and human government more intelligent, happy, cooperative, and peaceful -helping creating a transition into the future that is satisfying for most humans Edward W. Porter Porter & Associates 24 String Bridge S12 Exeter, NH 03833 (617) 494-1722 Fax (617) 494-1822 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=55777112-33cf1e
