> Because AI will save the world or destroy it?

Because it can significantly help us to accomplish our goals -
whatever that is ATM. Destroying the Earth might be in our best
interest at some point in the future. But not now I guess :). Of
course depends on who will control the AGI, but powerful tools that
could be used to destroy our planet exist for some time now and we are
still here, so hopefully things will go well. And don't think that
those who are clever enough to develop powerful AGI are stupid enough
to not implement equally powerful safety features to support desired
compatibility between the goal system of those in charge vs. actions
the AGI could possibly take on its own. Hopefully, "those in charge"
will read the manual in the case that the system is not intuitive
enough in this respect ;-).. Sure sure, accidents happen, but
generally, it's IMO better to rather have powerful tools than not
have. If we are too stupid to live then we don't deserve to live.. IMO
fair enough.. Let's give it a shot :-)

Regards,
Jiri Jelinek

On Oct 30, 2007 6:09 PM, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Jiri Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'll probably include a reference to the: Risks to civilization,
> > humans and planet Earth
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risks_to_civilization%2C_humans_and_planet_Earth
>
> Because AI will save the world or destroy it?
>
>
> -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----
> This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
> To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
> http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
>

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=59372009-281616

Reply via email to