> From: Dennis Gorelik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > John, > > >> Note, that compiler doesn't build application. > >> Programmer does (using compiler as a tool). > > > Very true. So then, is the programmer + compiler more complex that the > AGI > > ever will be? > > No. > I don't even see how it relates to what I wrote above ... > > > Or at some point does the AGI build and improve itself. > > Yes. > What's your point?
We were discussing whether or not building the software that then builds AGI would be easier than building AGI directly or perhaps if it is the same thing. I think that it may be possible to use computational power to construct some of the AGI "structure" either through evolutionary means of other ways. Example - When we create software applications we use compilers. When the applications get more complex we have to improve the compilers (otherwise AutoCad 2007 could be built with QBasic). For AGI do we need to improve the compliers to the point where they actually write the source code? IOW just exploring ways of creating self-creating/self-modifying AGI. John ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=71004118-fa5784
