Edward, It's certainly a trick question, since if you don't define semantics for this knowledge thing, it can turn out to be anything from simplest do-nothings to full-blown physically-infeasible superintelligences. So you assertion doesn't cut the viability of knowledge extraction for various purposes, and without that it's not clear what you actually mean.
On Dec 7, 2007 1:20 AM, Ed Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is something I have been telling people for years. That you should be > able to extract a significant amount (but probably far from all) world > knowledge by scanning large corpora of text. I would love to see how well > it actually works for a given size of corpora, and for a given level of > algorithmic sophistication. -- Vladimir Nesov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=73400395-303d49
