On Dec 13, 2007 12:09 AM, James Ratcliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mainly as a primer ontology / knowledge representation data set for an AGI > to work with. > Having a number of facts known without having to be typed in about many > frames and connections between frames gives an AGI a good booster to start > with. > > Taken a simple set of common words in a house chair, table, sock, closet > etc, a house agi bot could get a feel for objects it would expect to find in > a house, and what locations to look for say a sock, and properties of a > sock, without having to have that information typed in from a human user. > Then that information would be updated thru experience, and with a human > trainer working with an embodied (probably virtual) agi. >
Yes, it's how story usually goes. But if you don't specify how ontology will be used, why do you believe that it will be more useful than original texts? Probably at a point where you'll be able to make use of ontology you'd also be able to analyze texts directly (that is, if you aim that high, otherwise it's a different issue entirely). -- Vladimir Nesov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=75420074-1ea3c3
