Richard,

I don't think Shane and Marcus's overview of definitions-of-intelligence
is "poor quality".

I think it is just doing something different than what you think it should be
doing.

The overview is exactly that: A review of what researchers have said about
the definition of intelligence.

This is useful as a view into the cultural mind-space of the research
community regarding the intelligence concept.

As for their formal definition of intelligence, I think it is worthwhile as a
precise formulation of one perspective on the multidimensional concept
of intelligence.  I don't agree with them that they have somehow captured
the essence of the concept of intelligence in their formal definition though;
I think they have just captured one aspect...

-- Ben G


On 1/14/08, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pei Wang wrote:
> > On Jan 13, 2008 7:40 PM, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> And, as I indicated, my particular beef was with Shane Legg's paper,
> >> which I found singularly content-free.
> >
> > Shane Legg and Marcus Hutter have a recent publication on this topic,
> >     http://www.springerlink.com/content/jm81548387248180/
> > which is much richer in content.
>
> Unfortunately, this paper is not so much "richer in content" as
> "containing a larger number of words and formulae".  It adds nothing to
> the previous (poor quality) paper, falls into exactly the same pitfalls
> as before, and repeats the trick of pulling an arbitrary mathematical
> definition out of the hat without saying why this definition should
> correspond with the natural or commonsense definition.
>
> Any fool can mathematize a definition of a commonsense idea without
> actually saying anything new.
>
>
> Richard Loosemore
>
> -----
> This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
> To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
> http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;
>

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=85626959-5ab00c

Reply via email to