Will, The situation you mentioned is possible, but I'd assume, given the similar functions from percepts to states, there must also be similar functions from states to actions, that is, AC = GC(SC), AH = GH(SH), GC ≈ GH
Consequently, it becomes a special case of my "Principle-AI", with a compound function: AC = GC(FC(PC)), AH = GH(FH(PH)), GC(FC()) ≈ GH(FH()) Pei 2008/1/14 William Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Something I noticed while trying to fit my definition of AI into the > categories given. > > There is another way that definitions can be principled. > > This similarity would not be on the function of percepts to action. > Instead it would require a similarity on the function of percepts to > internal state as well. That is they should be able to adapt in a > similar fashion. > > SC = FC(PC), SH = FH(PH), FC ≈ FH > > I'm not strictly speaking working on intelligence at the moment, > rather how to build adaptive programmable computer architectures > (which I think is a necessary first step to intelligence), so it might > take me a while to get around to fully working out my definition of > intelligence. It would contain principles like the one I mention above > though. > > Will Pearson > > ----- > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&; ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=85815783-9a4a33
