On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:52 PM, J Storrs Hall, PhD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I claim that we can and do think in each of the 16 modes implied by the above > (and others as well).
That is certainly true... > I think the key to AI is not so much to figure how to operate in any given > one > of them, but how to operate in more than one, using one as a pilot wave or > boundary condition for another. *Creating* symbols from continuous > experience. Forming a conditioned reflex by deliberation and practice. Fair enough. Do you see this integration as being needed for version 1.0; that is, instead of trying first for a program that's good at one mode, you'd try first for a program that has a minimal competence in several, and can integrate between them? If so, do you have any theories on how to achieve this integration? ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=101455710-f059c4 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
