What a bizarre discussion. This branch started when J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
Neurons *are* simple, analogous to a transistor....
But.... this statement is such a blatant contradiction of all the known facts about neurons, that I am surprised that abyone would try to defend it. Real neurons are complicated, and their actual functional role in the brain is still quite unknown. I know of no-one working in the field of neural nets (including myself) who would agree with the above statement in any way.
What's to discuss? Richard Loosemore ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
