On Jun 1, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Mark Waser wrote:
I find it very interesting that you can't even answer a straight yes- or-no question without resorting to obscuring BS and inventing strawmen.


By "obscuring BS and inventing strawmen" I assume you mean answers that do not fit into your narrow conceptual framework.


Are you actually claiming that neurotransmitter levels are irrelevant or are you implementing them?


Neurotransmitter levels are irrelevant. The function may or may not be, and the function would be directly implemented in the former case.


Are you claiming that leakage along the axons and dendrites is irrelevant or are you modeling it?


Axon and dendrite leakage is irrelevant. The function may or may not be, and the function would be directly implemented in the former case.


Two simple questions. Two choices for each. Try answering them without the obscuring BS.


What is it with you and the false dichotomies?

What you fail to state is the reason I would implement any particular characteristic of wetware neurons; what function is being gained by doing so? Hint: if I can implement it in code I can pretty trivially ascertain its function by analysis. This is the whole "cargo cult AI" thing I was talking about. You insist it is valuable to add objectively functionless features, and you have hard time explaining what features are supposedly missing if we *don't* implement things that lack functionality. Sounds like a waste of time to me, unless you think these features do something magical.


Step back a second and justify adding gee-gaws to the models first. For the neural characteristics that have a function, we don't need to copy them -- we can implement the functionality directly. Algorithmic equivalence and all that.

J. Andrew Rogers



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to