Ben wrote:
I think that AGI, right now, could also be analyzed as having four
main approaches
1-- logic-based ... including a host of different logic formalisms
2-- neural net/ brain simulation based ... including some biologically
quasi-realistic systems and some systems that are more formal and
abstract
3-- integrative ... which itself is a very broad category with a lot
of heterogeneity ... including e.g. systems composed of wholly
distinct black boxes versus systems that have intricate real-time
feedbacks between different components' innards
4-- miscellaneous ... evolutionary learning, etc. etc.
It's hardly a herd, it's more of a chaos ;-p
-- Ben
-----------------------------------------------
I think you have to include complexity. Although complexity problems can be /
should be seen as an issue relevant to all AGI paradigms, the significance of
the problem makes it a primary concern to me. I would say that I am interested
in the problems of complexity and integration of concepts.
Jim Bromer
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
