In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [agi] Patterns and Automata
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:26:43 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acjqd2/upUdwObXiT+Wx0QccpzkjsgBCQ2zQ
Content-Language: en-us
Well I have lots and lots of related mathematics paper references covering
parts and pieces but nothing that shows how to build the full system.
Here is a paper that talks a little about forest automata -
http://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~bojan/papers/forest.pdf
For morphisms -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphism
So.. nothing on the related cognition engineering though... but expanding on
graph isomorphism detection theory leads to the beginnings of that.
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abram Demski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 8:46 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [agi] Patterns and Automata
>
> Can you cite any papers related to the approach you're attempting? I
> do not know anything about morphism detection, morphism forests, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Abram
>
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:03 AM, John G. Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> From: Abram Demski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> No, not especially familiar, but it sounds interesting. Personally I
> >> am interested in learning formal grammars to describe data, and there
> >> are well-established equivalences between grammars and automata, so
> >> the approaches are somewhat compatible. According to wikipedia,
> >> semiautomata have no output, so you cannot be using them as a
> >> generative model, but they also lack accept-states, so you can't be
> >> using them as recognition models, either. How are you using them?
> >>
> >
> > Hi Abram,
> >
> > More of recognizing them verses using them to recognize. Also though
> they
> > have potential as morphism detection catalysts.
> >
> > I haven't designed the formal languages, I guess that I'm still
> building
> > alphabets, an alphabet would consist of discrete knowledge structure.
> My
> > model is a morphism forest and I will integrate automata networks
> within
> > this - but still need to do language design. The languages will run
> within
> > the automata networks.
> >
> > Uhm I'm interested too in languages and protocol. Most modern internet
> > protocol is primitive. Any ideas on languages and internet protocol?
> > Sometimes I think that OSI layers need to be refined. Almost like
> there
> > needs to be another layer :) a.k.a. Layer 8.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > agi
> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
> > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> agi
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> cbdf2a
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
