Terren: Substituting an actual human invalidates the experiment, because then you are bringing something in that can actually do semantics. The point of the argument is to show how merely manipulating symbols (i.e. the syntactical domain) is not a demonstration of understanding, no matter what the global result of the manipulation is (e.g., a chess move). Got ya! We're on the same line then.
------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
